remittances were often sufficient to cover
A
possible liabilities over a period of several
months; it would therefore have been in
accordance with the system if the Colonial
Government had remitted the sum of £200,000 at
once instead of making a contract for remitting
it in several instalments, since it was clear
that the sum total of £200,000 would be re-
quired by the Crown Agents over the following
few months. If that had been done, the charge
of speculation with public funds could
scarcely have been put forward. In conclusion,
the Governor asked to be allowed to use dis-
cretion in such matters, subject to any
limitations and conditions which the Secretary
of State thought necessary.
On that occasion you advised that
the buying of exchange forward to meet a known
liability on a known date was the very reverse
of speculation, but in the particular trans-
action in question an element of speculation
was present, since it was not a case of
arranging for a definite liability having to
be discharged on a fixed date. The Governor
was informed accordingly, but it was explained
to him that the Secretary of State approved
of his exercising his judgment in deciding on
any individual occasion what was the best
course to take in the public interest, since
in the Secretary of State's view the remittance
of money by the Colonial Government exactly
when money was required, without the freedom
to use discretion as to the best time for
remittances, would not be an advantageous
procedure
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.